From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker talk 22:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Depoul Militari metro station

Depoul Militari metro station (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks like a joke to me. I could not find any sources stating that the Depot might become a station. Preciziei metro station is already located next to Petru Poni high school. Strainu ( talk) 08:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This station does not exist, not even as "provisional" metro station (however that may work in an almost all-underground network), as the article claims, and there are no sources about any imminent plans for it to be built. - Andrei ( talk) 07:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete- Nothing proves that it will exist within the next few years, therefore does not require an article. Class455fan1 ( talk) 23:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as this is best mentioned as part of another article since there's nothing particularly better as its own article, nothing convincing of the needed independence. SwisterTwister talk 21:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker talk 22:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Depoul Militari metro station

Depoul Militari metro station (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks like a joke to me. I could not find any sources stating that the Depot might become a station. Preciziei metro station is already located next to Petru Poni high school. Strainu ( talk) 08:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This station does not exist, not even as "provisional" metro station (however that may work in an almost all-underground network), as the article claims, and there are no sources about any imminent plans for it to be built. - Andrei ( talk) 07:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete- Nothing proves that it will exist within the next few years, therefore does not require an article. Class455fan1 ( talk) 23:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as this is best mentioned as part of another article since there's nothing particularly better as its own article, nothing convincing of the needed independence. SwisterTwister talk 21:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook