The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment – Hi
SportingFlyer: part of your nomination is not valid. See
WP:NEXIST, part of Wikipedia's Notability guideline page, where it states, "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". In other words, an article that lacks sources can still potentially meet GNG requirements is such sources simply exist. They do not have to be present in the article. North America100009:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment – Hi
SportingFlyer: part of your nomination is not valid. See
WP:NEXIST, part of Wikipedia's Notability guideline page, where it states, "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". In other words, an article that lacks sources can still potentially meet GNG requirements is such sources simply exist. They do not have to be present in the article. North America100009:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.