- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:05, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Democratic Coalition (United States)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Democratic Coalition (United States) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a two-sentence article about a political action committee with no clear claim to notability. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 05:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 05:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 05:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep and improve I've expanded the stub a bit, with references showing substantial coverage in multiple secondary RS per WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 06:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete (for now). Too soon to see evidence of their notability or accomplishments. Millions of people hate Trump, it's not worth an article if no action has been taken. Maybe next year. Trillfendi ( talk) 20:13, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep covered in multiple unaffiliated (or independent) reliable sources which shows this article satisfies the criteria for inclusion per WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG.
- Merely reading through the references, I can see this topic is the subject of significant coverage in the Washington Post [1], Newsday [2], Mother Jones (you'll have to scroll down a bit), NBC News [3], The Science Christian Monitor [4], CNN [5] and the Daily Beast [6].--- Steve Quinn ( talk) 05:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Too soon for notability SalmanZ ( talk) 22:06, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Article shows sustained significant coverage over a three year period which to my mind seriously weakens the argument of WP:TOOSOON. 4meter4 ( talk) 19:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:05, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Democratic Coalition (United States)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Democratic Coalition (United States) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a two-sentence article about a political action committee with no clear claim to notability. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 05:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 05:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 05:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep and improve I've expanded the stub a bit, with references showing substantial coverage in multiple secondary RS per WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Tracy Von Doom ( talk) 06:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete (for now). Too soon to see evidence of their notability or accomplishments. Millions of people hate Trump, it's not worth an article if no action has been taken. Maybe next year. Trillfendi ( talk) 20:13, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep covered in multiple unaffiliated (or independent) reliable sources which shows this article satisfies the criteria for inclusion per WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG.
- Merely reading through the references, I can see this topic is the subject of significant coverage in the Washington Post [1], Newsday [2], Mother Jones (you'll have to scroll down a bit), NBC News [3], The Science Christian Monitor [4], CNN [5] and the Daily Beast [6].--- Steve Quinn ( talk) 05:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Too soon for notability SalmanZ ( talk) 22:06, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Article shows sustained significant coverage over a three year period which to my mind seriously weakens the argument of WP:TOOSOON. 4meter4 ( talk) 19:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.