The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
fails WP:CREATIVE . sources don't look reliable and gnews yields little
LibStar (
talk) 15:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as there's simply nothing here of actual substance, the information and sources themselves are simply trivial and unconvincing, there's no notability at all and there's honestly nothing else, thus delete.
SwisterTwistertalk 01:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete In general the sources are either by Daniels, instead of being about her, or autobiographical, which is not what we need either, or essentially directory listings.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 23:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
fails WP:CREATIVE . sources don't look reliable and gnews yields little
LibStar (
talk) 15:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as there's simply nothing here of actual substance, the information and sources themselves are simply trivial and unconvincing, there's no notability at all and there's honestly nothing else, thus delete.
SwisterTwistertalk 01:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete In general the sources are either by Daniels, instead of being about her, or autobiographical, which is not what we need either, or essentially directory listings.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 23:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.