The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep as misguided nomination. —
sjorford(talk) 09:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete This is an encyclopedia, not a "Wacky unrelated facts" page. Most of the listed events are unimmportant or inane. Why bother cleaning up something so unnecessary
The Anti Clutch 09:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete Completely subjective. Doing it objectivly would require an innordiante ammount of space and time and would still serve no educational purpose. Save these lists for E-mail spam.
Closed as speedy keep - I suggest you take more of a look around Wikipedia before nominating such a high-profile page for deletion. —
sjorford(talk) 09:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep as misguided nomination. —
sjorford(talk) 09:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete This is an encyclopedia, not a "Wacky unrelated facts" page. Most of the listed events are unimmportant or inane. Why bother cleaning up something so unnecessary
The Anti Clutch 09:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete Completely subjective. Doing it objectivly would require an innordiante ammount of space and time and would still serve no educational purpose. Save these lists for E-mail spam.
Closed as speedy keep - I suggest you take more of a look around Wikipedia before nominating such a high-profile page for deletion. —
sjorford(talk) 09:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.