The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 01:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Most of the links in article are of PR nature. Not notable architecture firm Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 14:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
My aim is to add as much architectural stuff to Wikipedia as possible - not just about well established practices and people but young ones that are also interesting and relevant. I have only had time to do these so far but will be doing more - so it is not a "one off". A lot of architectural pages on Wikipedia reference news articles and the architects own website (==Zaha Hadid==) - just because it is a news item surely does not mean it is not a reputable source. Surely each should be judged individually. In my experience the Architects' Journal, Dezeen etc are the go to for architectural news and information. Thanks for considering 80.71.4.139 ( talk) 12:55, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Architecturalhistorian
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 01:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Most of the links in article are of PR nature. Not notable architecture firm Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 14:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
My aim is to add as much architectural stuff to Wikipedia as possible - not just about well established practices and people but young ones that are also interesting and relevant. I have only had time to do these so far but will be doing more - so it is not a "one off". A lot of architectural pages on Wikipedia reference news articles and the architects own website (==Zaha Hadid==) - just because it is a news item surely does not mean it is not a reputable source. Surely each should be judged individually. In my experience the Architects' Journal, Dezeen etc are the go to for architectural news and information. Thanks for considering 80.71.4.139 ( talk) 12:55, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Architecturalhistorian