From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Daze, Arizona

Daze, Arizona (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. No evidence that this is or was a notable populated place. (Split from previous batch AfD) – dlthewave 16:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. – dlthewave 16:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. – dlthewave 16:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Along the ATSF railroad, maybe a siding named after Wm. Daze, but I can't find anything indicating it was a populated place or notable. We need an article to list Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway sites apparently. Reywas92 Talk 21:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, no evidence this was a populated place. GNIS does have a separate entry for a station building, so this was indeed a stop on this old section of the ATSF. Per RFD on train stations, there was no consensus that every station is automatically notable, so this again needs to meet GNG. Certainly reasonable to mention in Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway and redirect, but that article doesn't currently get into this level of detail. MB 01:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment If we could add and redirect this to a list of Atchison & Topeka stations in Arizona, that'd be the best overall result so we don't lose the place name but don't give it its own article. I've been looking at maps from the Arizona library from the 1930s and Corva has buildings nearby on the map, and a road to the settlement, but Daze, which is nearby, does not, and has no road. SportingFlyer T· C 07:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment Daze, Arizona First nomination for deletion. Was a Speedy Keep, nomination withdrawn. 7&6=thirteen ( ) 13:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen ( ) 14:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 16:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete if Merge is not an option. Do not see this satisfying WP:GNG. PenulisHantu ( talk) 18:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • comment Older topo maps show that there used to be passing sidings here, so there was a "station" in that back far enough there would have been someone to deal with train orders and switches, but it doesn't imply that trains actually stopped here. Mangoe ( talk) 21:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:MILL. Not every siding or station is notable. Bearian ( talk) 15:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Daze, Arizona

Daze, Arizona (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. No evidence that this is or was a notable populated place. (Split from previous batch AfD) – dlthewave 16:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. – dlthewave 16:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. – dlthewave 16:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Along the ATSF railroad, maybe a siding named after Wm. Daze, but I can't find anything indicating it was a populated place or notable. We need an article to list Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway sites apparently. Reywas92 Talk 21:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, no evidence this was a populated place. GNIS does have a separate entry for a station building, so this was indeed a stop on this old section of the ATSF. Per RFD on train stations, there was no consensus that every station is automatically notable, so this again needs to meet GNG. Certainly reasonable to mention in Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway and redirect, but that article doesn't currently get into this level of detail. MB 01:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment If we could add and redirect this to a list of Atchison & Topeka stations in Arizona, that'd be the best overall result so we don't lose the place name but don't give it its own article. I've been looking at maps from the Arizona library from the 1930s and Corva has buildings nearby on the map, and a road to the settlement, but Daze, which is nearby, does not, and has no road. SportingFlyer T· C 07:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment Daze, Arizona First nomination for deletion. Was a Speedy Keep, nomination withdrawn. 7&6=thirteen ( ) 13:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen ( ) 14:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 16:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete if Merge is not an option. Do not see this satisfying WP:GNG. PenulisHantu ( talk) 18:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • comment Older topo maps show that there used to be passing sidings here, so there was a "station" in that back far enough there would have been someone to deal with train orders and switches, but it doesn't imply that trains actually stopped here. Mangoe ( talk) 21:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:MILL. Not every siding or station is notable. Bearian ( talk) 15:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook