From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Visakhapatnam#Cityscape. ( non-admin closure) Steven Crossin 03:05, 2 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Dayalnagar Colony (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its just a suburb of Visakhapatnam city and without any Relable Sources and hence not notable as per WP:NotabilityIM3847 ( talk) 15:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep no rationale provided for deletion. Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment This is a very small area, 27 acres and 196 houses. There could be an article if it met GNG. I found one source to confirm it exists [1]. The article can be expanded from this source, but it's still probably not enough for GNG. I don't quite understand the use of "colony" here and whether that would make this place "legally recognized" per WP:GEOLAND. MB 04:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
"Colony" should be considered a nonce word here, like "Park" or "Place". It doesn't mean that this was ever an independent colony. Power~enwiki ( talk) 19:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Visakhapatnam#Cityscape. ( non-admin closure) Steven Crossin 03:05, 2 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Dayalnagar Colony (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its just a suburb of Visakhapatnam city and without any Relable Sources and hence not notable as per WP:NotabilityIM3847 ( talk) 15:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep no rationale provided for deletion. Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment This is a very small area, 27 acres and 196 houses. There could be an article if it met GNG. I found one source to confirm it exists [1]. The article can be expanded from this source, but it's still probably not enough for GNG. I don't quite understand the use of "colony" here and whether that would make this place "legally recognized" per WP:GEOLAND. MB 04:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
"Colony" should be considered a nonce word here, like "Park" or "Place". It doesn't mean that this was ever an independent colony. Power~enwiki ( talk) 19:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook