- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
David Cann
- David Cann ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about an actor who has clearly had a wide number of quite minor roles, but not multiple major roles which would get him over Wikipedia's WP:NACTOR notability threshold. There are no examples of significant coverage about Cann in WP:RS. Time for article to go. Sionk ( talk) 00:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Sionk - funny but I disagree with you completely. I think it does meet WP:GNG with that many roles versus so many notable actors, I just think it fails WP:PROMO for the way it's written. ChalkDrawings33 ( talk) 06:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete We are not IMDb, people are not notable for lots of insignificant roles. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
David Cann
- David Cann ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about an actor who has clearly had a wide number of quite minor roles, but not multiple major roles which would get him over Wikipedia's WP:NACTOR notability threshold. There are no examples of significant coverage about Cann in WP:RS. Time for article to go. Sionk ( talk) 00:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Sionk - funny but I disagree with you completely. I think it does meet WP:GNG with that many roles versus so many notable actors, I just think it fails WP:PROMO for the way it's written. ChalkDrawings33 ( talk) 06:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete We are not IMDb, people are not notable for lots of insignificant roles. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.