The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable author: only 1 book with more than 2 library holdings. almost all are self published. DGG (
talk ) 23:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC) (nomination withdrawn--see below) DGG (
talk ) 02:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment: I did find some limited coverage of him as far as his acting goes, but it's pretty much just local papers and I'm not entirely certain about whether it's enough to really push him past notability guidelines.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:36, 18 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123(yarn) @ 21:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm withdrawing the nomination. Much to my surprise, he is included in Gale Contemporary Authors,
[1], and we have always accepted inclusion there as for any other standard subject encyclopedia as proof of notability. Most public libraries have the database in one or another form, and WorldCat will always indicate if someone is included. It's part of the basic check for any author. (I think the inclusion is based on Master of Verona, which has 266 copies in WorldCat.) He seemed so non-notable I skipped checking. DGG (
talk ) 02:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable author: only 1 book with more than 2 library holdings. almost all are self published. DGG (
talk ) 23:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC) (nomination withdrawn--see below) DGG (
talk ) 02:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment: I did find some limited coverage of him as far as his acting goes, but it's pretty much just local papers and I'm not entirely certain about whether it's enough to really push him past notability guidelines.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:36, 18 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123(yarn) @ 21:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm withdrawing the nomination. Much to my surprise, he is included in Gale Contemporary Authors,
[1], and we have always accepted inclusion there as for any other standard subject encyclopedia as proof of notability. Most public libraries have the database in one or another form, and WorldCat will always indicate if someone is included. It's part of the basic check for any author. (I think the inclusion is based on Master of Verona, which has 266 copies in WorldCat.) He seemed so non-notable I skipped checking. DGG (
talk ) 02:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.