- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Dave Hughes (politician)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dave Hughes (politician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable failed political candidate; does not pass WP:NPOL. A WP:BEFORE search returned only trivial and WP:ROUTINE election news, with no significant coverage, indicating the subject fails WP:GNG. Curbon7 ( talk) 07:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Conservatism, and Minnesota. Curbon7 ( talk) 07:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, while I can see coverage such as this and this is not trivial and seems to be independent and secondary, it also seems to more like WP:ROUTINE coverage in the lead up to an election which didn't amount to anything and which did not result in the candidate being further recognised. I can't see anything too recently which asserts notability for this individual, who does appear to fail WP:NPOL. Maybe in future, but for now at least I think WP:TOOSOON. Bungle ( talk • contribs) 09:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - The coverage in existence is routine. Given that the candidate is unelected, they are not subject to sufficient significant coverage outside that which is routine to be considered notable. MaxnaCarta ( talk) 09:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, and the article is no longer maintained. Kablammo ( talk) 12:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Failed political candidates are not notable. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 17:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Dave Hughes (politician)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dave Hughes (politician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable failed political candidate; does not pass WP:NPOL. A WP:BEFORE search returned only trivial and WP:ROUTINE election news, with no significant coverage, indicating the subject fails WP:GNG. Curbon7 ( talk) 07:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Conservatism, and Minnesota. Curbon7 ( talk) 07:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, while I can see coverage such as this and this is not trivial and seems to be independent and secondary, it also seems to more like WP:ROUTINE coverage in the lead up to an election which didn't amount to anything and which did not result in the candidate being further recognised. I can't see anything too recently which asserts notability for this individual, who does appear to fail WP:NPOL. Maybe in future, but for now at least I think WP:TOOSOON. Bungle ( talk • contribs) 09:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - The coverage in existence is routine. Given that the candidate is unelected, they are not subject to sufficient significant coverage outside that which is routine to be considered notable. MaxnaCarta ( talk) 09:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, and the article is no longer maintained. Kablammo ( talk) 12:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Failed political candidates are not notable. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 17:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.