- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Despite the fact some Keep arguments were rather weak (the early ones), there still seems to be a clear consensus that Darya passes WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG despite two relists. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 08:59, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Darya Poverennova
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Darya Poverennova ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- A non-notable Russian actress. No significant roles.-- RTY9099 ( talk) 22:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 December 14. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Google News results suggest sufficient notability. -- Michig ( talk) 07:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:40, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle ( talk) 00:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle ( talk) 00:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. She's been in twelve films and comes from a famous theatrical family. Morgan Leigh | Talk 02:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Notability is not inherited. Her family's notability doesn't make her notable, WP:NOTINHERITED. Ifnord ( talk) 02:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Alot of notability found with just a simple Google search. Have added some sources. -- TheDomain ( talk) 05:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Questions There is a Theatre section, which simply states an affiliation. Does anyone have access to any sources about her stage appearances? The only reference in this section that I can open is more about her love life than her work. Re the Filmography - it is very hard to tell, just from this table, whether the TV series are notable or not, and whether she had significant roles in them or not. RebeccaGreen ( talk) 13:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be notable given accomplishments listed in the article.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 20:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs more discussion of relevant sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Needs more discussion of relevant sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The Russian-language Wikipedia article is convincing that she passes WP:NACTOR/ WP:GNG. Bondegezou ( talk) 17:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per sources at her Russian Wikipedia article, Meets NACTOR as well as GNG. – Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 16:41, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Despite the fact some Keep arguments were rather weak (the early ones), there still seems to be a clear consensus that Darya passes WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG despite two relists. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 08:59, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Darya Poverennova
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Darya Poverennova ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- A non-notable Russian actress. No significant roles.-- RTY9099 ( talk) 22:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 December 14. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 00:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Google News results suggest sufficient notability. -- Michig ( talk) 07:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:40, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle ( talk) 00:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle ( talk) 00:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. She's been in twelve films and comes from a famous theatrical family. Morgan Leigh | Talk 02:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Notability is not inherited. Her family's notability doesn't make her notable, WP:NOTINHERITED. Ifnord ( talk) 02:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Alot of notability found with just a simple Google search. Have added some sources. -- TheDomain ( talk) 05:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Questions There is a Theatre section, which simply states an affiliation. Does anyone have access to any sources about her stage appearances? The only reference in this section that I can open is more about her love life than her work. Re the Filmography - it is very hard to tell, just from this table, whether the TV series are notable or not, and whether she had significant roles in them or not. RebeccaGreen ( talk) 13:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be notable given accomplishments listed in the article.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 20:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs more discussion of relevant sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Needs more discussion of relevant sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The Russian-language Wikipedia article is convincing that she passes WP:NACTOR/ WP:GNG. Bondegezou ( talk) 17:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per sources at her Russian Wikipedia article, Meets NACTOR as well as GNG. – Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 16:41, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.