The result was no consensus. Merging is an editorial decision and is left to editorial discretion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC) reply
I think this entry should be deleted. Danielle or Beverley is actually too new to be included. Yes she was a "model" years ago and achieved some notoriety for her past transgressions but I think she is truly a flash in the pan at this stage. Reconsider her in five years if she lasts that long.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Moosiecat ( talk • contribs) 02:32, July 15, 2010
*Delete. The only cited sources are MySpace, her own website, and Amazon.com. That is not sufficient. Also, calling her a reality "star" seems to be a stretch.
Kansan (
talk) 05:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
I took the liberty of moving the following comment from the Talk:Danielle Staub where it was mistakenly placed. Herostratus ( talk) 01:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Merging is an editorial decision and is left to editorial discretion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC) reply
I think this entry should be deleted. Danielle or Beverley is actually too new to be included. Yes she was a "model" years ago and achieved some notoriety for her past transgressions but I think she is truly a flash in the pan at this stage. Reconsider her in five years if she lasts that long.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Moosiecat ( talk • contribs) 02:32, July 15, 2010
*Delete. The only cited sources are MySpace, her own website, and Amazon.com. That is not sufficient. Also, calling her a reality "star" seems to be a stretch.
Kansan (
talk) 05:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
I took the liberty of moving the following comment from the Talk:Danielle Staub where it was mistakenly placed. Herostratus ( talk) 01:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC) reply