The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 20:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
this is a vanity article. a quick search on discogs.com and juno.co.uk gives no results for this group, and there's no way they can be pioneers of gabber if they formed in 2005. "Danger Trance Incorporated" gives a paltry 13 hits on google, and their label "TranceFusion Records" gives only 68 results. sorry to those who have put effort into cleaning the article up but i'm putting this up for afd. compare with nu style gabber/darkcore label enzyme records which gives 72,600 results. -- MilkMiruku 18:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 20:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
this is a vanity article. a quick search on discogs.com and juno.co.uk gives no results for this group, and there's no way they can be pioneers of gabber if they formed in 2005. "Danger Trance Incorporated" gives a paltry 13 hits on google, and their label "TranceFusion Records" gives only 68 results. sorry to those who have put effort into cleaning the article up but i'm putting this up for afd. compare with nu style gabber/darkcore label enzyme records which gives 72,600 results. -- MilkMiruku 18:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply