- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak, CSD G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Danale Inc ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company by any criterion created by declared COI editor, declined at AFC but he copy-pasted it prematurely to mainspace. He removed PROD and cannot provide an evidence their company is notable. Fails WP:GNG, no reliable coverage I can found the paid editor cannot provide one either. Fails all SNGs about organizations, no WP:CORPDEPTH. Earlier created it with name Danale platform and it was speedily deleted. — Ammarpad ( talk) 03:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:09, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:09, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. On an interesting note, two blue linked execs in the infobox are the wrong people; the SPA who created the article was probably planning to create articles on them, hence the links. I requested a speedy deletion under G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Promotionalism,and almost certainly non notable. DGG ( talk ) 23:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak, CSD G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Danale Inc ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company by any criterion created by declared COI editor, declined at AFC but he copy-pasted it prematurely to mainspace. He removed PROD and cannot provide an evidence their company is notable. Fails WP:GNG, no reliable coverage I can found the paid editor cannot provide one either. Fails all SNGs about organizations, no WP:CORPDEPTH. Earlier created it with name Danale platform and it was speedily deleted. — Ammarpad ( talk) 03:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:09, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:09, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. On an interesting note, two blue linked execs in the infobox are the wrong people; the SPA who created the article was probably planning to create articles on them, hence the links. I requested a speedy deletion under G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Promotionalism,and almost certainly non notable. DGG ( talk ) 23:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.