- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep as per unanimous consensus and no calls for deletion beyond the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 17:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Dana Meadows, Kaghan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. WP:GEOLAND may apply, although it is unknown if this is a legally recognized place due to lack of reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate said sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Please do not hesitate to contact me should appropriate sources be located during the course of this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 21:01, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 21:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 21:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep legally recognised. link from govt. run site. samee converse 08:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Samee. This is a recognised place which is popular among the tourists as per these RS; WWF, PTDC, Jang. Apparently no significant coverage exist but this one passes WP:GEOLAND. -- Saqib ( talk) 18:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, plenty of reference. No need to delete. I have added few reference in article.-- Spasage ( talk) 19:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- I think wikipedia is quite lenient on places, as places assume almost an automatic notability and are worthy of an encyclopedic entry (per WP:NGEO). So, i will also go with keep. Having said that, the article does need improvement. M A A Z T A L K 18:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GEOLAND per Saqib. Mar4d ( talk) 09:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep as per unanimous consensus and no calls for deletion beyond the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 17:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Dana Meadows, Kaghan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. WP:GEOLAND may apply, although it is unknown if this is a legally recognized place due to lack of reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate said sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Please do not hesitate to contact me should appropriate sources be located during the course of this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 21:01, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 21:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 21:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep legally recognised. link from govt. run site. samee converse 08:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Samee. This is a recognised place which is popular among the tourists as per these RS; WWF, PTDC, Jang. Apparently no significant coverage exist but this one passes WP:GEOLAND. -- Saqib ( talk) 18:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, plenty of reference. No need to delete. I have added few reference in article.-- Spasage ( talk) 19:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- I think wikipedia is quite lenient on places, as places assume almost an automatic notability and are worthy of an encyclopedic entry (per WP:NGEO). So, i will also go with keep. Having said that, the article does need improvement. M A A Z T A L K 18:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GEOLAND per Saqib. Mar4d ( talk) 09:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.