- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 09:55, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Dan Slater ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet any of the requirements of WP:POLITICIAN: not elected to an international, national or sub-national office, no significant press coverage, and no 3rd party sources to meet the WP:GNG. Being a failed candidate, an official of the local branch of a political party or a superdelegate doesn't meet any WP:Notability standards. Tassedethe ( talk) 17:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 19:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 19:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Clear lack of long-term notability. No claim to notability under WP:NPOL AusLondonder ( talk) 06:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete peoples whose highest claim to fame is being vice-chair of a US state federal party affiliate are not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. A politician who gets coverage mainly from running for office. Does not satisfy WP:POLITICIAN. Not finding significant independent RS coverage to pass GNG. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Unelected candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if you cannot demonstrate and properly source that he's notable enough for an article for some other reason independent of his candidacy, then he has to win the election, not just run in it, to stake notability onto the election itself. But being a superdelegate to a political party convention does not clear the bar in and of itself, and nothing else here does either. Bearcat ( talk) 18:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 09:55, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Dan Slater ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet any of the requirements of WP:POLITICIAN: not elected to an international, national or sub-national office, no significant press coverage, and no 3rd party sources to meet the WP:GNG. Being a failed candidate, an official of the local branch of a political party or a superdelegate doesn't meet any WP:Notability standards. Tassedethe ( talk) 17:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 19:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 19:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Clear lack of long-term notability. No claim to notability under WP:NPOL AusLondonder ( talk) 06:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete peoples whose highest claim to fame is being vice-chair of a US state federal party affiliate are not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. A politician who gets coverage mainly from running for office. Does not satisfy WP:POLITICIAN. Not finding significant independent RS coverage to pass GNG. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Unelected candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if you cannot demonstrate and properly source that he's notable enough for an article for some other reason independent of his candidacy, then he has to win the election, not just run in it, to stake notability onto the election itself. But being a superdelegate to a political party convention does not clear the bar in and of itself, and nothing else here does either. Bearcat ( talk) 18:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.