The result was delete. Clear consensus-- if it is too new to have sources it is too new to be notable. DGG ( talk ) 20:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced article about unremarkable company which makes no attempt to assert notability. Biker Biker ( talk) 07:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply
I, the author of the article have already improved the content of DAHL Mobile article to prove that the company is legal and remarkable as requested by Biker Biker, Tokyogirl79, and Lukeno94, coming from different sources and links that are not form DAHL. Please do not go on with the deletion of this article. Thank you! - OptiStar OptiStar ( talk) 12:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Clear consensus-- if it is too new to have sources it is too new to be notable. DGG ( talk ) 20:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced article about unremarkable company which makes no attempt to assert notability. Biker Biker ( talk) 07:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply
I, the author of the article have already improved the content of DAHL Mobile article to prove that the company is legal and remarkable as requested by Biker Biker, Tokyogirl79, and Lukeno94, coming from different sources and links that are not form DAHL. Please do not go on with the deletion of this article. Thank you! - OptiStar OptiStar ( talk) 12:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC) reply