- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- DSK International Campus ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A recreation of an article recently deleted via PROD. Article recreated by Special:Contributions/DSKICPUNE (same editor as extensively having edited the prior version of the article).
Original Oct 2016 PROD: "An unremarkable for-profit educational institution; significant RS coverage cannot be found. Being extensively edited by Special:Contributions/DSKICPUNE which suggests a COI."
Suggest salting due to persistent recreation. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 19:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and Salt given the obvious blatancy of motivated advertising when this is explicitly deleted a week ago for both G11 and no signs of significance and there's literally nothing else better, I'll note that even the current article is G11 again. SwisterTwister talk 22:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: I'm unsure about notability of topic; it may or may not meet the required standard ( sources). For now it seems in favor of encyclopedia to get rid of this spam'y article. I can give it a second thought - if it is re-written by an unaffiliated person. I'm also not sure about salt'ing - it was previously speedy deleted (G11) on 6-Nov (I go by at least two G11 in a year). Anup [Talk] 14:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 14:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I found this statement, "You get a certificate from French government which is recognized by National Committee for Professional Certification, at the highest level granted by the French Ministry of Employment, grade level 7 in Europe. Once you graduate, you will be an International Masters degree holder." from http://dskic.in/faq/ I can't evaluate the assertion, but it seems like it might meet Wikipedia requirements, and the topics they are covering and the international aspect and it being in English seem worth a more thorough review than what we've seen so far. Unscintillating ( talk) 01:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment --- definitely needs salting as the editor in question (with quite obvious COI judging by the name) is back editing the article: diff. I believe it would be impossible to keep the article neutral. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Looking at the logs and comparing with the nomination shows that you know information about the prod and the previous article that is not public. How is that? Unscintillating ( talk) 01:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Because I was the one who PRODed it; pls see User:K.e.coffman/PROD_log. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- DSK International Campus ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A recreation of an article recently deleted via PROD. Article recreated by Special:Contributions/DSKICPUNE (same editor as extensively having edited the prior version of the article).
Original Oct 2016 PROD: "An unremarkable for-profit educational institution; significant RS coverage cannot be found. Being extensively edited by Special:Contributions/DSKICPUNE which suggests a COI."
Suggest salting due to persistent recreation. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 19:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and Salt given the obvious blatancy of motivated advertising when this is explicitly deleted a week ago for both G11 and no signs of significance and there's literally nothing else better, I'll note that even the current article is G11 again. SwisterTwister talk 22:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: I'm unsure about notability of topic; it may or may not meet the required standard ( sources). For now it seems in favor of encyclopedia to get rid of this spam'y article. I can give it a second thought - if it is re-written by an unaffiliated person. I'm also not sure about salt'ing - it was previously speedy deleted (G11) on 6-Nov (I go by at least two G11 in a year). Anup [Talk] 14:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 14:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I found this statement, "You get a certificate from French government which is recognized by National Committee for Professional Certification, at the highest level granted by the French Ministry of Employment, grade level 7 in Europe. Once you graduate, you will be an International Masters degree holder." from http://dskic.in/faq/ I can't evaluate the assertion, but it seems like it might meet Wikipedia requirements, and the topics they are covering and the international aspect and it being in English seem worth a more thorough review than what we've seen so far. Unscintillating ( talk) 01:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment --- definitely needs salting as the editor in question (with quite obvious COI judging by the name) is back editing the article: diff. I believe it would be impossible to keep the article neutral. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Looking at the logs and comparing with the nomination shows that you know information about the prod and the previous article that is not public. How is that? Unscintillating ( talk) 01:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Because I was the one who PRODed it; pls see User:K.e.coffman/PROD_log. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.