The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:NORG. The sources don't establish the company itself as notable; i.e. they lack significant coverage beyond mere mention. Now, I note that most of the sources are permanently dead, but from what I could find, there just isn't enough here. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 01:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:NORG. The sources don't establish the company itself as notable; i.e. they lack significant coverage beyond mere mention. Now, I note that most of the sources are permanently dead, but from what I could find, there just isn't enough here. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 01:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)