The result was keep. Wizardman 20:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is unsuitable for an encyclopedia, fails to meet the relevant notability guideline for Wikipedia content, and violates WP:SNOW. Besides if we have an article for Omaha, we might as well have an article for every major city (i.e. Czechs in San Francisco or Czechs in Tokyo) — Noah¢s ( Talk) 21:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because I feel that none of these are notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia:
Keep. Notability is proven by reliable sources, and as the article demonstrates, the topic of Czechs in Omaha has been notable enough to warrant a number of reliable citations. If Czechs in San Francisco or Czechs in Tokyo are as notable then those could be great additions to WP, as well. None of the aforementioned articles are listcruft, and I would suggest that Doc Strange look at the articles he's supporting for deletion. • Freechild 'sup? 22:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Wizardman 20:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is unsuitable for an encyclopedia, fails to meet the relevant notability guideline for Wikipedia content, and violates WP:SNOW. Besides if we have an article for Omaha, we might as well have an article for every major city (i.e. Czechs in San Francisco or Czechs in Tokyo) — Noah¢s ( Talk) 21:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because I feel that none of these are notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia:
Keep. Notability is proven by reliable sources, and as the article demonstrates, the topic of Czechs in Omaha has been notable enough to warrant a number of reliable citations. If Czechs in San Francisco or Czechs in Tokyo are as notable then those could be great additions to WP, as well. None of the aforementioned articles are listcruft, and I would suggest that Doc Strange look at the articles he's supporting for deletion. • Freechild 'sup? 22:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply