The result was Delete. The only "keep" opinion to address the article (instead of procedural arguments), while a valid opinion, was not sufficient (in strength of argument or in numbers for those who prefer a votecount) against the consensus of other editors about this article. Fram ( talk) 09:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC) reply
another laughable combination from the obsessive creator. only 2 minor agreements between the 2 nations [1]. Google news search doesn't show much either [2] LibStar ( talk) 00:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply
"Don't be silly" is really a rude way to address a fellow editor. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis ( talk) 23:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The only "keep" opinion to address the article (instead of procedural arguments), while a valid opinion, was not sufficient (in strength of argument or in numbers for those who prefer a votecount) against the consensus of other editors about this article. Fram ( talk) 09:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC) reply
another laughable combination from the obsessive creator. only 2 minor agreements between the 2 nations [1]. Google news search doesn't show much either [2] LibStar ( talk) 00:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply
"Don't be silly" is really a rude way to address a fellow editor. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis ( talk) 23:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply