The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam SailorTalk! 17:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
People have
conflicts of interest. Articles are inanimate, and do not. Please state, with reference to
deletion policy, a reason for deleting this (lopsidedly sourced) article.
Uncle G (
talk) 18:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Doesn't look like the nominator will be replying, since they've now been blocked as a sockpuppet. --|Uncle Milty |
talk| 22:40, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Since that's the case, I've had a quick look around myself for in-depth reliable and independent sources that actually discuss this subject, rather than discuss another company and only tangentially mention this one. I didn't find any.
Uncle G (
talk) 00:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep because the nominator has failed to explain the conflict of interest that motivated this nomination. --
Metropolitan90(talk) 13:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and speedy tag as I have now, there's nothing at all actually convincing and there's no need to clarify from the nominator as the current article says it all. FWIW, my searches have also found several links now but nothing comparably better convincing so delete at best for now.
SwisterTwistertalk 20:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam SailorTalk! 17:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
People have
conflicts of interest. Articles are inanimate, and do not. Please state, with reference to
deletion policy, a reason for deleting this (lopsidedly sourced) article.
Uncle G (
talk) 18:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Doesn't look like the nominator will be replying, since they've now been blocked as a sockpuppet. --|Uncle Milty |
talk| 22:40, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Since that's the case, I've had a quick look around myself for in-depth reliable and independent sources that actually discuss this subject, rather than discuss another company and only tangentially mention this one. I didn't find any.
Uncle G (
talk) 00:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep because the nominator has failed to explain the conflict of interest that motivated this nomination. --
Metropolitan90(talk) 13:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and speedy tag as I have now, there's nothing at all actually convincing and there's no need to clarify from the nominator as the current article says it all. FWIW, my searches have also found several links now but nothing comparably better convincing so delete at best for now.
SwisterTwistertalk 20:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.