The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirectedNSLE(
T+
C) at 06:30
UTC (
2006-04-17)
Non-notable cyclone, Australian Category 1, has not even made landfall; see
this page for typical layout of non-notable cyclones in the region. This is just plainly superfluos. Delete.
TydeNet06:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirectedNSLE(
T+
C) at 06:30
UTC (
2006-04-17)
Non-notable cyclone, Australian Category 1, has not even made landfall; see
this page for typical layout of non-notable cyclones in the region. This is just plainly superfluos. Delete.
TydeNet06:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.