- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Cybersecurity strategy 5 Layout Capability Maturity Model
- Cybersecurity strategy 5 Layout Capability Maturity Model ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research by the editor. The article has been turned down at Draft:Cybersecurity strategy 5 Layout Capability Maturity Model. StarryGrandma ( talk) 20:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. StarryGrandma ( talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The readily identified source of this is the contributor's own company spiel about its service. (Compare the within linked pdf to this article.) As such, it appears to be purely promotional. I do not find any evidence that this model or the company that offers it have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. ~ Ningauble ( talk) 18:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A hybrid between promotional material and an introductory manual for the system. WP is the place for neither. DGG ( talk ) 06:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT and WP:GNG. APerson ( talk!) 17:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This is a misunderstanding of WP:ENC and it fails WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Cybersecurity strategy 5 Layout Capability Maturity Model
- Cybersecurity strategy 5 Layout Capability Maturity Model ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research by the editor. The article has been turned down at Draft:Cybersecurity strategy 5 Layout Capability Maturity Model. StarryGrandma ( talk) 20:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. StarryGrandma ( talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The readily identified source of this is the contributor's own company spiel about its service. (Compare the within linked pdf to this article.) As such, it appears to be purely promotional. I do not find any evidence that this model or the company that offers it have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. ~ Ningauble ( talk) 18:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A hybrid between promotional material and an introductory manual for the system. WP is the place for neither. DGG ( talk ) 06:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT and WP:GNG. APerson ( talk!) 17:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This is a misunderstanding of WP:ENC and it fails WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.