The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.
Punkmorten 10:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
I don't believe this is a particularly notable group. Various permutations of the title get large numbers of Google hits, but most are not relevent. The article has the feel of an advert for the site and the group.
Joyous |
Talk 13:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete; agree with nom, most search results are irrelevant and/or are of a similar spammy goodness. --Kinut/
c 19:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. NN. The GHits generally don't seem to apply to these people. Very few conspiracy theorists are notable, and these are not the exceptions. Linking the Illuminati to the Patriot Act is mildly original, but not notable.
Fan1967 23:11, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete nn --
Khoikhoi 08:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete as NN and unverifiable.
ProhibitOnions 12:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.
Punkmorten 10:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
I don't believe this is a particularly notable group. Various permutations of the title get large numbers of Google hits, but most are not relevent. The article has the feel of an advert for the site and the group.
Joyous |
Talk 13:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete; agree with nom, most search results are irrelevant and/or are of a similar spammy goodness. --Kinut/
c 19:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. NN. The GHits generally don't seem to apply to these people. Very few conspiracy theorists are notable, and these are not the exceptions. Linking the Illuminati to the Patriot Act is mildly original, but not notable.
Fan1967 23:11, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete nn --
Khoikhoi 08:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete as NN and unverifiable.
ProhibitOnions 12:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.