The result of the debate was speedy keep: Nomination withdrawn and nobody argues for deletion. – Jitse Niesen ( talk) 21:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not meet any of the three criteria at
WP:WEB. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a web directory. Could also be considered advertizing per the soapbox section of
WP:NOT *Delete. -
Halidecyphon 09:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
:Changing my vote to no vote per SciAm award just added to the article. It now could be seen as satisfying
WP:WEB, although personally I do not believe the spirit of that guidline is to copy every tech magazine's annual "best of the web" to wikipedia. -
Halidecyphon
16:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was speedy keep: Nomination withdrawn and nobody argues for deletion. – Jitse Niesen ( talk) 21:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not meet any of the three criteria at
WP:WEB. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a web directory. Could also be considered advertizing per the soapbox section of
WP:NOT *Delete. -
Halidecyphon 09:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
:Changing my vote to no vote per SciAm award just added to the article. It now could be seen as satisfying
WP:WEB, although personally I do not believe the spirit of that guidline is to copy every tech magazine's annual "best of the web" to wikipedia. -
Halidecyphon
16:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
reply