The result was delete. After 2 AFDs, the consensus among editors who are actually here to build an encyclopedia is that this article should be deleted. No offense to the few good faith "keep" !voters. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 03:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Previous AFD resulted in no consensus, but since then, nearly every editor who !voted keep has been blocked (see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Yaratam and WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive746#Daniel Bruno). Let's try this again; hopefully, with fewer sock puppets involved. Dori ☾ Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Given that the closer of the previous AFD wrote at the time, "No prejudice against relisting this article at AfD after giving the authors a reasonable amount of time to work on these issues," combined with the "authors" subsequently being blocked, means (to me, at least) that they had had their chance and aren't likely to be improving this article any further. Dori ☾ Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 05:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. After 2 AFDs, the consensus among editors who are actually here to build an encyclopedia is that this article should be deleted. No offense to the few good faith "keep" !voters. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 03:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Previous AFD resulted in no consensus, but since then, nearly every editor who !voted keep has been blocked (see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Yaratam and WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive746#Daniel Bruno). Let's try this again; hopefully, with fewer sock puppets involved. Dori ☾ Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Given that the closer of the previous AFD wrote at the time, "No prejudice against relisting this article at AfD after giving the authors a reasonable amount of time to work on these issues," combined with the "authors" subsequently being blocked, means (to me, at least) that they had had their chance and aren't likely to be improving this article any further. Dori ☾ Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 05:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC) reply