The result was keep. No prejudice towards merging discussion or editorial discussions about scope. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This article is about the term crotch, not about crotches per se. Per WP:NOTDIC, Wikipedia articles are not normally about terms, particularly when one term covers multiple topics. That is the job of Wiktionary, which already has an entry for crotch. There is also little chance that this article can be expanded into something encyclopedic. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 18:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No prejudice towards merging discussion or editorial discussions about scope. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This article is about the term crotch, not about crotches per se. Per WP:NOTDIC, Wikipedia articles are not normally about terms, particularly when one term covers multiple topics. That is the job of Wiktionary, which already has an entry for crotch. There is also little chance that this article can be expanded into something encyclopedic. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 18:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC) reply