The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrodynamic Space Thruster - basically the same reasons as that AfD. Unreferenced, original research; bordering on pseudoscience in some parts. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( talk) 21:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
I think saying something is pseudoscience without explaining why, may sound as calumny.
As far as I can understand, pseudoscience is something that is unable to prove its claims such as producing unlimited clean energy; thinking in this way, all fusion concepts up to now, such as NIF, Tokamaks (JET, ITER), and so forth, should be put in the realm of pseudoscience for not proving their claims even with decades of heavy investments and scientific support.
Crossfire reactor uses same ideas that are used in some of these fusion concepts; it has a little different setup in comparison to Farnsworth-Hirsch Fusor and Polywell. And as far as I can see, from description, calculation and drawings, the setup is technically reasonable and feasible, and it does not use exotic things to be considered as pseudoscience.
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Probonopublic (
talk •
contribs) 17:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrodynamic Space Thruster - basically the same reasons as that AfD. Unreferenced, original research; bordering on pseudoscience in some parts. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry ( talk) 21:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
I think saying something is pseudoscience without explaining why, may sound as calumny.
As far as I can understand, pseudoscience is something that is unable to prove its claims such as producing unlimited clean energy; thinking in this way, all fusion concepts up to now, such as NIF, Tokamaks (JET, ITER), and so forth, should be put in the realm of pseudoscience for not proving their claims even with decades of heavy investments and scientific support.
Crossfire reactor uses same ideas that are used in some of these fusion concepts; it has a little different setup in comparison to Farnsworth-Hirsch Fusor and Polywell. And as far as I can see, from description, calculation and drawings, the setup is technically reasonable and feasible, and it does not use exotic things to be considered as pseudoscience.
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Probonopublic (
talk •
contribs) 17:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
reply