The result of the debate was KEEP (no consensus). TigerShark 08:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC) reply
An arbitrary lumping together of whatever negative anyone has said about >1 Jew in the history of mankind. Fully and obviously fails WP:NOR and WP:NPOV and should be deleted. JFW | T@lk 23:34, 18 June 2006 (UTC) reply
....or it will give the impression that Judaism the one "ism" which is above critisism on Wikipedia. (Some) content could be merged from Anti-Judaism and the Critical historical view section in the Judaism article. What represents anti-Jewish/anti-Semitic opinion in the article should be removed. Hshhh, I´m not really here 16:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Second comment: taking a look at:
Generally it looks as if the "Anti-.." articles deals with bias against a religion. (Cartoons depicting stereotypes would be appropriate in such an article, IMO, as would any expression of irrational, emotional feelings.)
The "Criticism of.." articles (should!) examine the more scholarly criticism of a religion through the ages. What other (religious) scholars write about Judaism would be very relevant and appropriate in this article. Hshhh, I´m not really here 19:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was KEEP (no consensus). TigerShark 08:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC) reply
An arbitrary lumping together of whatever negative anyone has said about >1 Jew in the history of mankind. Fully and obviously fails WP:NOR and WP:NPOV and should be deleted. JFW | T@lk 23:34, 18 June 2006 (UTC) reply
....or it will give the impression that Judaism the one "ism" which is above critisism on Wikipedia. (Some) content could be merged from Anti-Judaism and the Critical historical view section in the Judaism article. What represents anti-Jewish/anti-Semitic opinion in the article should be removed. Hshhh, I´m not really here 16:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Second comment: taking a look at:
Generally it looks as if the "Anti-.." articles deals with bias against a religion. (Cartoons depicting stereotypes would be appropriate in such an article, IMO, as would any expression of irrational, emotional feelings.)
The "Criticism of.." articles (should!) examine the more scholarly criticism of a religion through the ages. What other (religious) scholars write about Judaism would be very relevant and appropriate in this article. Hshhh, I´m not really here 19:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC) reply