The result was delete. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 02:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts may be tagged using:{{subst:spa|username}} |
None of the refs provide any evidence of notability, as far as I can find, and the author of the article has declined to help to pointing out if any. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC) reply
External references have been added and discrepancies have been deleted to comply with general notability guidelines, do review the reordered references and citations and additional references. Haribhagirath ( talk) 13:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The article seems to be a simple introduction about a company.The references provided are from websites which are completely independent.As far as I can see its a company over-view, and there is no attempt of advertisement over here.Its a company registered in India, hence the chances of posting online credentials is limited.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Raja.assasin ( talk • contribs)
Yes the WP:ORG guidelines are adhered, I believe references are independent and secondary Haribhagirath ( talk) 09:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Please do verify 11 references instead of 5. ( talk) 09:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep- Mr. Dicklyon...I am no puppet(wiki has a facility to track Ip addresses...it can gladly do the same with me)...I strongly feel that the article has enough online references to be a part of wikipedia....Facebook was 2004 startup...it did make a significant impact.The reference meet the criteria that wikipedia has set. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raja.assasin ( talk • contribs) 04:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 02:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts may be tagged using:{{subst:spa|username}} |
None of the refs provide any evidence of notability, as far as I can find, and the author of the article has declined to help to pointing out if any. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC) reply
External references have been added and discrepancies have been deleted to comply with general notability guidelines, do review the reordered references and citations and additional references. Haribhagirath ( talk) 13:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The article seems to be a simple introduction about a company.The references provided are from websites which are completely independent.As far as I can see its a company over-view, and there is no attempt of advertisement over here.Its a company registered in India, hence the chances of posting online credentials is limited.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Raja.assasin ( talk • contribs)
Yes the WP:ORG guidelines are adhered, I believe references are independent and secondary Haribhagirath ( talk) 09:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Please do verify 11 references instead of 5. ( talk) 09:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep- Mr. Dicklyon...I am no puppet(wiki has a facility to track Ip addresses...it can gladly do the same with me)...I strongly feel that the article has enough online references to be a part of wikipedia....Facebook was 2004 startup...it did make a significant impact.The reference meet the criteria that wikipedia has set. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raja.assasin ( talk • contribs) 04:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply