- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- CrazyLister ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Classic UPE article; all the sources are WP:MILL/insufficient and the UPE editor has just spammed random references, none of which show notability. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 16:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete lack of notability, clearly fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Rentier ( talk) 17:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: A WP:SPA article on a start-up sourced to its Crunchbase, blog and other user-submitted placements. No evidence of attained notability, whether by WP:NSOFT, WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD ( talk) 18:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Article has all the hallmarks of a commissioned work. Start up company with no claims to significance or importance. Some users just don't understand that a plethora of sources comprising fleeting mentions or routine reports of funding does not equate to notability. Fails WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 18:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Mentions, fails GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 04:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Small seed stage startup with very little coverage. Icewhiz ( talk) 08:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Looks too soon to me. No prejudice against userfying if someone wants to tuck it away and check back on it this time next year. GMG talk 16:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- CrazyLister ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Classic UPE article; all the sources are WP:MILL/insufficient and the UPE editor has just spammed random references, none of which show notability. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 16:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete lack of notability, clearly fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Rentier ( talk) 17:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: A WP:SPA article on a start-up sourced to its Crunchbase, blog and other user-submitted placements. No evidence of attained notability, whether by WP:NSOFT, WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD ( talk) 18:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Article has all the hallmarks of a commissioned work. Start up company with no claims to significance or importance. Some users just don't understand that a plethora of sources comprising fleeting mentions or routine reports of funding does not equate to notability. Fails WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 18:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Mentions, fails GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 04:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Small seed stage startup with very little coverage. Icewhiz ( talk) 08:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Looks too soon to me. No prejudice against userfying if someone wants to tuck it away and check back on it this time next year. GMG talk 16:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.