- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe decker talk 06:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Cr OS Linux
- Cr OS Linux ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A minor, dodgy Linux distro of the past that was active for about three years. There were a tiny number of news articles published about it, but I don't think they are enough to establish notability. The distro wasn't even carried by proper mirrors, having to resort to a file hosting service named DepositFiles to share the disk images. With this kind of services, downloaders have either to pay for a premium service, or use a free option that is intentionally made slow and cumbersome. Even most very small distros are able to get better hosting for their images. ilmaisin ( talk) 11:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 11:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 11:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Nothing particularly better. SwisterTwister talk 21:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability. The linuxinsider.com and lifehacker refs are significant coverage, but do little to clarify why this distro is notable apart from its misleadingly similar name to Google's Chrome OS. Dialectric ( talk) 04:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe decker talk 06:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Cr OS Linux
- Cr OS Linux ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A minor, dodgy Linux distro of the past that was active for about three years. There were a tiny number of news articles published about it, but I don't think they are enough to establish notability. The distro wasn't even carried by proper mirrors, having to resort to a file hosting service named DepositFiles to share the disk images. With this kind of services, downloaders have either to pay for a premium service, or use a free option that is intentionally made slow and cumbersome. Even most very small distros are able to get better hosting for their images. ilmaisin ( talk) 11:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 11:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 11:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Nothing particularly better. SwisterTwister talk 21:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability. The linuxinsider.com and lifehacker refs are significant coverage, but do little to clarify why this distro is notable apart from its misleadingly similar name to Google's Chrome OS. Dialectric ( talk) 04:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.