The result was no consensus. Its only claim to notability is historical significance, and that is precisely what has not been settled in this AfD. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The article does not assert why the route is notable. Consensus (see WP:USRD/NT) is that intracounty county routes are not notable and precedent ( WP:USRD/P) is that intracounty routes that do not assert why they are notable will be deleted. In terms of this article, the history that is given has little to do with the road itself and doesn't explain why the highway is notable - it reads more like a history of Marcellus than it does the history of a highway within it. I am aware this passed Good Article; however, GA does not factor in notability in its evaluation of articles, so its GA status should not be a factor in whether this article is kept or deleted. – T M F 16:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC) reply
I have read through this article and have been unable to see the notability of this road. A Google News Archive search returns no results about this road, while a Google search returns no reliable sources. As a result, my vote is delete this article which is full of original research and which lacks suitable sources to conduct a merge. Cunard ( talk) 19:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Its only claim to notability is historical significance, and that is precisely what has not been settled in this AfD. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The article does not assert why the route is notable. Consensus (see WP:USRD/NT) is that intracounty county routes are not notable and precedent ( WP:USRD/P) is that intracounty routes that do not assert why they are notable will be deleted. In terms of this article, the history that is given has little to do with the road itself and doesn't explain why the highway is notable - it reads more like a history of Marcellus than it does the history of a highway within it. I am aware this passed Good Article; however, GA does not factor in notability in its evaluation of articles, so its GA status should not be a factor in whether this article is kept or deleted. – T M F 16:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC) reply
I have read through this article and have been unable to see the notability of this road. A Google News Archive search returns no results about this road, while a Google search returns no reliable sources. As a result, my vote is delete this article which is full of original research and which lacks suitable sources to conduct a merge. Cunard ( talk) 19:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC) reply