The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Awww. Do we really have to delete it? I want to be remembered after I leave this planet...
Taylor.clapp 05:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)reply
blah Pure hoax. And if anyone recognises whence the image has been ripped off, please say. --
RHaworth 06:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. You're right - he seems to live up to his article's initials.
Grutness...wha? 06:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete It's a pity; the author sure seemed to put a lot of time into fudging it. I got a kick out of reading it through, anyway...
CA387 08:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete per all above. --
Tikiwont 08:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Very reluctant delete one of the better hoaxes for a long while. -
Iridescenti(talk to me!) 09:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. So if you like it, copy it to
WP:BJAODN. And curses I missed the initials! --
RHaworth 14:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Yes, delete, more's the pity. A good laugh, even if the designation "Count" doesn't actually exist in the English peerage. He would have been an earl, which rather spoils the acronym.
BTLizard 10:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment Okay, the page is
here. I have no clue what I'm doing with
WP:BJAODN, though, so someone else will have to check to make sure everything's kosher.
CA387 18:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Awww. Do we really have to delete it? I want to be remembered after I leave this planet...
Taylor.clapp 05:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)reply
blah Pure hoax. And if anyone recognises whence the image has been ripped off, please say. --
RHaworth 06:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. You're right - he seems to live up to his article's initials.
Grutness...wha? 06:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete It's a pity; the author sure seemed to put a lot of time into fudging it. I got a kick out of reading it through, anyway...
CA387 08:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete per all above. --
Tikiwont 08:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Very reluctant delete one of the better hoaxes for a long while. -
Iridescenti(talk to me!) 09:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. So if you like it, copy it to
WP:BJAODN. And curses I missed the initials! --
RHaworth 14:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Yes, delete, more's the pity. A good laugh, even if the designation "Count" doesn't actually exist in the English peerage. He would have been an earl, which rather spoils the acronym.
BTLizard 10:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment Okay, the page is
here. I have no clue what I'm doing with
WP:BJAODN, though, so someone else will have to check to make sure everything's kosher.
CA387 18:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.