[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CougarTech ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable group. A high school FIRST Robotics Competition team; no independent coverage in the article. [1] (a local weekly) was the best search result I could find. Covers multiple school districts, so neither is a plausible redirect target. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and New York. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, there is nothing to suggest its notability. The existing two sources in the article are as good as minus zero and there are no sources elsewhere to improve it. This clearly fails WP:GNG. Ednabrenze ( talk) 07:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable at this time; lacking WP:SIGCOV from independent, reliable sources. Prof.PMarini ( talk) 09:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CougarTech ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable group. A high school FIRST Robotics Competition team; no independent coverage in the article. [1] (a local weekly) was the best search result I could find. Covers multiple school districts, so neither is a plausible redirect target. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and New York. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, there is nothing to suggest its notability. The existing two sources in the article are as good as minus zero and there are no sources elsewhere to improve it. This clearly fails WP:GNG. Ednabrenze ( talk) 07:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable at this time; lacking WP:SIGCOV from independent, reliable sources. Prof.PMarini ( talk) 09:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)