The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is an unreferenced one-sentence article. I moved it to draftspace to be worked on, unfortunately it was just moved back to mainspace with no effort made to add references or address concerns in any way. No evidence of meeting
WP:NOTABILITY.
Boleyn (
talk)
21:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep It is easy to find sources for such topics. For example,
Wild Pigs in the United States
The Walking Larder
Vegetable and animal food sorts found in the gastric content of Sardinian Wild Boar (Sus scrofa meridionalis)
Damages caused to crops by wild boars (S. scrofa meridionalis) in Sardinia
Reproductive and demographic parameters in Sardinian wild boar, Sus scrofa meridionalis
and so on. Neither AfD nor Prod are for
cleanup. Our
editing policy states clearly that "Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome."
Andrew D. (
talk)
21:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Andrew Davidson, by moving them back to mainspace within hours, without clear edit summaries as to why and without an attempt to improve them, is not 'collaborative editing' by any means. I didn't suggest they need cleanup, they need deletion or redirecting, or such serious work that it isn't clear at the moment that they can possibly meet our criteria - which is what draftspace is for. This is part of a series by an editor,
Dennis the mennis, who has refused to communicate or add sources.
Boleyn (
talk)
21:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Valid subspecies, material plainly exists and just needs to be added. Granted,
Dennis the mennis hasn't covered themselves in glory with these unreferenced stubs, but now that they are here, we might as well spruce them up. Did the minimum for this (and the other two - in process). --Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs)
23:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is an unreferenced one-sentence article. I moved it to draftspace to be worked on, unfortunately it was just moved back to mainspace with no effort made to add references or address concerns in any way. No evidence of meeting
WP:NOTABILITY.
Boleyn (
talk)
21:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep It is easy to find sources for such topics. For example,
Wild Pigs in the United States
The Walking Larder
Vegetable and animal food sorts found in the gastric content of Sardinian Wild Boar (Sus scrofa meridionalis)
Damages caused to crops by wild boars (S. scrofa meridionalis) in Sardinia
Reproductive and demographic parameters in Sardinian wild boar, Sus scrofa meridionalis
and so on. Neither AfD nor Prod are for
cleanup. Our
editing policy states clearly that "Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome."
Andrew D. (
talk)
21:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Andrew Davidson, by moving them back to mainspace within hours, without clear edit summaries as to why and without an attempt to improve them, is not 'collaborative editing' by any means. I didn't suggest they need cleanup, they need deletion or redirecting, or such serious work that it isn't clear at the moment that they can possibly meet our criteria - which is what draftspace is for. This is part of a series by an editor,
Dennis the mennis, who has refused to communicate or add sources.
Boleyn (
talk)
21:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Valid subspecies, material plainly exists and just needs to be added. Granted,
Dennis the mennis hasn't covered themselves in glory with these unreferenced stubs, but now that they are here, we might as well spruce them up. Did the minimum for this (and the other two - in process). --Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs)
23:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.