The result was no consensus. Certainly no consensus to delete, but the discussion shows that editorial discussion remains necessary to arrive at a consensus about how to continue with editing the article. Sandstein 06:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC) reply
This article offers little information on a subject that is well covered in other articles such as Prison, Penology, Recidivism, Rehabilitation (penology), Incarceration in the United States, etc. JeffJ ( talk) 21:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I've added another paragraph to the article from a new source which explains that "corrections" vs. "penology" was a philosophical, not just terminological issue, and that it also had real impact on the practice. So, I think it's reasonable to at least have the well-sourced contents of this article merged to other one if not simply kept separate. Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 11:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Certainly no consensus to delete, but the discussion shows that editorial discussion remains necessary to arrive at a consensus about how to continue with editing the article. Sandstein 06:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC) reply
This article offers little information on a subject that is well covered in other articles such as Prison, Penology, Recidivism, Rehabilitation (penology), Incarceration in the United States, etc. JeffJ ( talk) 21:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply
I've added another paragraph to the article from a new source which explains that "corrections" vs. "penology" was a philosophical, not just terminological issue, and that it also had real impact on the practice. So, I think it's reasonable to at least have the well-sourced contents of this article merged to other one if not simply kept separate. Have mörser, will travel ( talk) 11:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply