- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Of note is that the nominator withdrew in a comment in the discussion. North America 1000 14:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Cornish Cyder Farm
- Cornish Cyder Farm ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced and tagged for notability for three years it doesn't appear to pass the WP:GNG Theroadislong ( talk) 17:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, no sources. NawlinWiki ( talk) 20:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. I found few news sources that were not blogs or "puff" broadsheets, but I did find some book references, two of which I've added to the article. I've also done a bit of copyediting to reduce the promotional language in the article. I think there is enough to establish notability. Geoff Who, me? 19:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Ive added to the article. Notable as one of only a handfull of whiskey producers in England, which has also won awards. Talskiddy ( talk) 07:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild ( talk) 07:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild ( talk) 07:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - regardless of Geoff's identity, Geoff's changes demonstrate sufficient WP:ORG notability. Good nomination and good response.-- Rpclod ( talk) 17:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment As the nominator I am happy to see the article kept after the addition of sources which clearly show some notability. Theroadislong ( talk) 17:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Of note is that the nominator withdrew in a comment in the discussion. North America 1000 14:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Cornish Cyder Farm
- Cornish Cyder Farm ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced and tagged for notability for three years it doesn't appear to pass the WP:GNG Theroadislong ( talk) 17:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, no sources. NawlinWiki ( talk) 20:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. I found few news sources that were not blogs or "puff" broadsheets, but I did find some book references, two of which I've added to the article. I've also done a bit of copyediting to reduce the promotional language in the article. I think there is enough to establish notability. Geoff Who, me? 19:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Ive added to the article. Notable as one of only a handfull of whiskey producers in England, which has also won awards. Talskiddy ( talk) 07:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild ( talk) 07:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild ( talk) 07:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - regardless of Geoff's identity, Geoff's changes demonstrate sufficient WP:ORG notability. Good nomination and good response.-- Rpclod ( talk) 17:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment As the nominator I am happy to see the article kept after the addition of sources which clearly show some notability. Theroadislong ( talk) 17:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.