- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Cooperative clustering
- Cooperative clustering ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of Notability. This tiny subtopic of cluster analysis appears to be only followed by a single author, cited 30 times including false positives. Most matches of "cooperative clustering" refer to very other methods - search for "Cooperative-Based Clustering" "Cooperative-Based+Clustering" Google Scholar to fully see the obscurity of this topic. All in all, not a lot of independent coverage: "Cooperative+Clustering"+Kamel Google Scholar except self-cites by Kashef and Kamel.
The article had been created to support Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooperative-based graph clustering which has already been deleted because of lacking notability. HelpUsStopSpam ( talk) 23:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delte at best for now as this is questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Cooperative clustering
- Cooperative clustering ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of Notability. This tiny subtopic of cluster analysis appears to be only followed by a single author, cited 30 times including false positives. Most matches of "cooperative clustering" refer to very other methods - search for "Cooperative-Based Clustering" "Cooperative-Based+Clustering" Google Scholar to fully see the obscurity of this topic. All in all, not a lot of independent coverage: "Cooperative+Clustering"+Kamel Google Scholar except self-cites by Kashef and Kamel.
The article had been created to support Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooperative-based graph clustering which has already been deleted because of lacking notability. HelpUsStopSpam ( talk) 23:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delte at best for now as this is questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.