The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete for failing
WP:CITE. No references to support popularity for a stand alone article. It's already listed in the
General Mills article. Without references it's akin to accepting a page for a Youtube video just based on view count hits.BlueRiband► 22:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment – Possibly selectively merge to
List of breakfast cereals. I have added some sources to the article, but this may not qualify for a standalone. This will enhance and improve the merge target article, as per
WP:PRESERVE. North America1000 23:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - Meets
WP:GNG. Seems like one of those subjects that is such a part of popular culture that good sources get buried. NA1000's sources scrape the surface sufficiently. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 15:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Agree to Keep as there are now references to support
WP:N. BlueRiband► 01:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep as this certainly notable and acceptable.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Article now has references and passes GNG, basically everyone who grows up in the US knows what Cookie Crisp is
Prisencolin (
talk) 00:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete for failing
WP:CITE. No references to support popularity for a stand alone article. It's already listed in the
General Mills article. Without references it's akin to accepting a page for a Youtube video just based on view count hits.BlueRiband► 22:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment – Possibly selectively merge to
List of breakfast cereals. I have added some sources to the article, but this may not qualify for a standalone. This will enhance and improve the merge target article, as per
WP:PRESERVE. North America1000 23:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - Meets
WP:GNG. Seems like one of those subjects that is such a part of popular culture that good sources get buried. NA1000's sources scrape the surface sufficiently. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 15:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Agree to Keep as there are now references to support
WP:N. BlueRiband► 01:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep as this certainly notable and acceptable.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Article now has references and passes GNG, basically everyone who grows up in the US knows what Cookie Crisp is
Prisencolin (
talk) 00:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.