The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I can't see how a street with no stated historical associations is notable enough for its own page on wikipedia. Some of the information could be merged into the neighbourhood article (
Kearny Mesa) but even then it would be adding unverified material. Any opinions people?
Madmedea15:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I can't see how a street with no stated historical associations is notable enough for its own page on wikipedia. Some of the information could be merged into the neighbourhood article (
Kearny Mesa) but even then it would be adding unverified material. Any opinions people?
Madmedea15:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.