- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Constitution of the Free Republic of Liberland
- Constitution of the Free Republic of Liberland ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article on a draft 'constitution' for an entirely unrecognised 'micronation' with a population of zero, based on a single primary source - or perhaps more accurately based on the article creator's interpretation of the primary source, which is thus original research. Nothing in the article establishes notability for the topic. A search reveals no coverage in reliable sources beyond passing comments to the effect that the draft exists. Liberland itself may well merit an article, given the coverage it has attracted, but I can see nothing in WP:N that indicates that imaginary 'constitutions' have any inherent notability - so lacking significant third-party coverage, the article should be deleted. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 19:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No coverage can be found in independent reliable sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability guidelines. Jbh Talk 19:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete By WP:ISNOT on various counts. Cheers, The Jolly Bard ( talk) 20:47, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Nuke it. I was originally hopeful it would be improved and gain more coverage, but it hasn't. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 21:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as lacking sourcing. Stuartyeates ( talk) 08:54, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. search brings up lots of news about the micronation and some trivial mentions that there is a constitution but nothing else. Article's references are to the constitution itself and a press release. Also only edits of one month old article creator is this article (except for 1 edit linking from article about micronation) which should have gone through afc, and would not have made it onto mainspace. Coolabahapple ( talk) 20:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 18:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. The article is entirely WP:OR and furthermore states that its subject is only a "draft" anyways. Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 18:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Constitution of the Free Republic of Liberland
- Constitution of the Free Republic of Liberland ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article on a draft 'constitution' for an entirely unrecognised 'micronation' with a population of zero, based on a single primary source - or perhaps more accurately based on the article creator's interpretation of the primary source, which is thus original research. Nothing in the article establishes notability for the topic. A search reveals no coverage in reliable sources beyond passing comments to the effect that the draft exists. Liberland itself may well merit an article, given the coverage it has attracted, but I can see nothing in WP:N that indicates that imaginary 'constitutions' have any inherent notability - so lacking significant third-party coverage, the article should be deleted. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 19:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No coverage can be found in independent reliable sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability guidelines. Jbh Talk 19:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete By WP:ISNOT on various counts. Cheers, The Jolly Bard ( talk) 20:47, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Nuke it. I was originally hopeful it would be improved and gain more coverage, but it hasn't. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 21:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as lacking sourcing. Stuartyeates ( talk) 08:54, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. search brings up lots of news about the micronation and some trivial mentions that there is a constitution but nothing else. Article's references are to the constitution itself and a press release. Also only edits of one month old article creator is this article (except for 1 edit linking from article about micronation) which should have gone through afc, and would not have made it onto mainspace. Coolabahapple ( talk) 20:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 18:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. The article is entirely WP:OR and furthermore states that its subject is only a "draft" anyways. Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 18:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.