- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Canadian Action Party. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Connie Fogal
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Connie Fogal ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:N; heavily biased and unsourced article; former leader of a fringe party, not notable. RoyalObserver ( talk) 20:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 04:36, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 04:37, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Canadian Action Party. I ran a Proquest news archive search. The sole profile I found was "A party leader comes back to her roots, Taylor, Mark. Moose Jaw Times Herald 13 Jan 2006 [1]. She did get a little coverage back in the day: Ideological Bedfellows: Despite coming from opposite sides of the political spectrum, activist Connie Fogal and former Vancouver councillor Jonathan Baker have united to give independent candidates a VOICE. The Vancouver Sun; Vancouver, B.C. [Vancouver, B.C]31 Aug 1996 "...activist-lawyer hitConnie hitFogal and former centre-right councillor Jonathan...". Very little. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 13:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and/or redirect. This article was created in 2004, which means it's a leftover from our old notability standards for politicians under which being a party leader, even of a minor fringe party like Canadian Action, was considered an "inherent" notability freebie that conferred automatic inclusion rights and thereby exempted the person from having to be reliably sourced as long as her existence as a party leader was verifiable. But those aren't the standards that apply today: a party leader now has to have enough reliable source coverage about her to clear WP:GNG, which fringe party leaders often don't. Bearcat ( talk) 14:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Canadian Action Party. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Connie Fogal
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Connie Fogal ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:N; heavily biased and unsourced article; former leader of a fringe party, not notable. RoyalObserver ( talk) 20:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 04:36, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 04:37, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Canadian Action Party. I ran a Proquest news archive search. The sole profile I found was "A party leader comes back to her roots, Taylor, Mark. Moose Jaw Times Herald 13 Jan 2006 [1]. She did get a little coverage back in the day: Ideological Bedfellows: Despite coming from opposite sides of the political spectrum, activist Connie Fogal and former Vancouver councillor Jonathan Baker have united to give independent candidates a VOICE. The Vancouver Sun; Vancouver, B.C. [Vancouver, B.C]31 Aug 1996 "...activist-lawyer hitConnie hitFogal and former centre-right councillor Jonathan...". Very little. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 13:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and/or redirect. This article was created in 2004, which means it's a leftover from our old notability standards for politicians under which being a party leader, even of a minor fringe party like Canadian Action, was considered an "inherent" notability freebie that conferred automatic inclusion rights and thereby exempted the person from having to be reliably sourced as long as her existence as a party leader was verifiable. But those aren't the standards that apply today: a party leader now has to have enough reliable source coverage about her to clear WP:GNG, which fringe party leaders often don't. Bearcat ( talk) 14:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.