From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that there is nothing encyclopaedic here so TNT applies. Spartaz Humbug! 13:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Congress in Haryana

Congress in Haryana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, declined, but no reason given. Original reason was: "Political propaganda and WP:OR disguised as an article" Fiddle Faddle 23:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete It is definitely propaganda, but beyond that, we already have an article for the Indian National Congress, not to mention a Politics of Haryana. I see no reason why there should be an article for a specific branch of a party in a specific area. And it's not really a title that would be proper being merged anywhere. So I think deleting it is the best option. Silver seren C 23:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or merge - the article was wrongly titled but if the party plays a major role in the state then perhaps there is nothing wrong with covering the role of a major player in a microcosm. We could weed the propaganda out and reword. But on the other hands it needs a lot of work as it is very badly written. Masterknighted ( talk) 00:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that there is nothing encyclopaedic here so TNT applies. Spartaz Humbug! 13:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Congress in Haryana

Congress in Haryana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, declined, but no reason given. Original reason was: "Political propaganda and WP:OR disguised as an article" Fiddle Faddle 23:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete It is definitely propaganda, but beyond that, we already have an article for the Indian National Congress, not to mention a Politics of Haryana. I see no reason why there should be an article for a specific branch of a party in a specific area. And it's not really a title that would be proper being merged anywhere. So I think deleting it is the best option. Silver seren C 23:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or merge - the article was wrongly titled but if the party plays a major role in the state then perhaps there is nothing wrong with covering the role of a major player in a microcosm. We could weed the propaganda out and reword. But on the other hands it needs a lot of work as it is very badly written. Masterknighted ( talk) 00:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook