- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Cong Hoa Roundabout
- Cong Hoa Roundabout ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not convinced that this is notable roundabout. A GBooks search turns up exactly two passing mentions of it. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 13:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No indication of notability of this unremarkable roundabout. Rcsprinter123 (pronounce) @ 10:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - An individual roundabout is generally not notable enough for its own article. Dough 48 72 18:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Cong Hoa Roundabout
- Cong Hoa Roundabout ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not convinced that this is notable roundabout. A GBooks search turns up exactly two passing mentions of it. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 13:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No indication of notability of this unremarkable roundabout. Rcsprinter123 (pronounce) @ 10:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - An individual roundabout is generally not notable enough for its own article. Dough 48 72 18:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.