- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Biblio worm 17:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Con of the North
AfDs for this article:
- Con of the North ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has been tagged for notability for 8 years (on and off). It has been to AfD twice with no consensus - the last time it had poor participation (only nominator and creator). If there is no consensus and reasonable participation, I think it would be best to remove notability tag. However, I couldn't verify that this is WP:NOTABLE in any way. No suitable redirect targets as the Lists of x require an aritcle for inclusion. Boleyn ( talk) 17:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Pretty clearly non-notable. Citations on the page are all non-reliable or primary source, except for that single article by the local newspaper. But that article is just run of the mill coverage for a local event, which of course you would find in any community newspaper in most cities in the world. My own searches turned up nothing better with which to expand the article. Even that community newspaper doesn't seem to cover this event every year, the article is from 2008. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete – Looks like a lovely local event, but the references are all either primary sources, self-published, or fairly trivial coverage in local press. I can't find anything better. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nsteffel ( talk) 17:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG, as the majority of sources are not WP:RS (or minor coverage in local news) and other, better sources could not be found through an internet search. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 02:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Biblio worm 17:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Con of the North
AfDs for this article:
- Con of the North ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has been tagged for notability for 8 years (on and off). It has been to AfD twice with no consensus - the last time it had poor participation (only nominator and creator). If there is no consensus and reasonable participation, I think it would be best to remove notability tag. However, I couldn't verify that this is WP:NOTABLE in any way. No suitable redirect targets as the Lists of x require an aritcle for inclusion. Boleyn ( talk) 17:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Pretty clearly non-notable. Citations on the page are all non-reliable or primary source, except for that single article by the local newspaper. But that article is just run of the mill coverage for a local event, which of course you would find in any community newspaper in most cities in the world. My own searches turned up nothing better with which to expand the article. Even that community newspaper doesn't seem to cover this event every year, the article is from 2008. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete – Looks like a lovely local event, but the references are all either primary sources, self-published, or fairly trivial coverage in local press. I can't find anything better. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nsteffel ( talk) 17:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG, as the majority of sources are not WP:RS (or minor coverage in local news) and other, better sources could not be found through an internet search. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 02:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.