- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 00:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Compound Document Comparison
- Compound Document Comparison ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional material for a patented technology, apparently written by the company that designed it. No links within Wikipedia, and no reliable sources. -lee ( talk) 15:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Reads like a badly written high school essay. Seems to have been created only as a coat-rack for spamming a patent by Litéra Technology LLC. — Ruud 13:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Simply nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 07:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A single Patent ref does not do anything to establish notability, and a search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as an apparent POV/Promo fork of Compound document. Dialectric ( talk) 23:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 00:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Compound Document Comparison
- Compound Document Comparison ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional material for a patented technology, apparently written by the company that designed it. No links within Wikipedia, and no reliable sources. -lee ( talk) 15:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Reads like a badly written high school essay. Seems to have been created only as a coat-rack for spamming a patent by Litéra Technology LLC. — Ruud 13:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Simply nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 07:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A single Patent ref does not do anything to establish notability, and a search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as an apparent POV/Promo fork of Compound document. Dialectric ( talk) 23:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.