- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Compensation (engineering)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Compensation (engineering) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has been around 16 years and hasn't managed to find a single source. The concept is so nebulous, that it doesn't make sense as a stand alone article. Much of it is simply pointing towards notable topics. Actually, all of it. It's more of a list that isn't a list than an article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete due to the article lacking sources and not indicating why its subject is notable. The article also fails WP:NPOV and WP:MOS. FAdesdae378 ( talk · contribs) 19:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Compensation (engineering)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Compensation (engineering) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has been around 16 years and hasn't managed to find a single source. The concept is so nebulous, that it doesn't make sense as a stand alone article. Much of it is simply pointing towards notable topics. Actually, all of it. It's more of a list that isn't a list than an article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete due to the article lacking sources and not indicating why its subject is notable. The article also fails WP:NPOV and WP:MOS. FAdesdae378 ( talk · contribs) 19:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.